The quickest boost for most
organizations’ bottom line is finding opportunities for decreasing cost without
sacrificing quality. An area frequently overlooked is the inventory of parts
kept on hand for maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO).
Typically, managers hesitate
to initiate a cost-cutting project in this area for fear that parts critical to
operations may not be available when needed. And the numbers of each individual
part—typically one or two—may look too small to yield meaningful cost savings.
In fact, however, it is
possible to minimize the capital invested in inventory without risking
equipment downtime, production downtime, or disruption to cyclical preventive
maintenance. To achieve this goal, managers must:
·
Isolate the sources of
demand for MRO parts.
·
Improve the processes involved
in creating an inventory for planned demand.
·
Improve safety stock
calculation.
·
Improve the processes
by which unplanned demand is factored in.
·
Optimize parts
ordering.
Step 1: Isolate the Source of Demand
There are two primary types
of demand that drive MRO parts Inventory:
·
Planned requirements,
which include:
q Maintenance parts used during scheduled maintenance,
clean-up or quality inspection processes. Most of these items are consumable,
and requirements for them are predictable over time.
q Replacement parts, the need for which can be
predicted using the equipment age and Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) data as
provided by the manufacturer.
·
Unplanned requirements,
which result from unanticipated equipment failure or accidents.
Step 2: Improve Processes for Planned Requirements
Typical inventories for
planned replacement parts can be minimized through:
·
Rigorous adherence to
inventory control processes.
·
Accurate inventory
quantity data.
·
Accurate purchasing
lead-time data.
·
Accurate MTBF data.
·
Predictable scheduled
maintenance cycles.
·
Accurate parts
requirements lists for preventive maintenance work orders.
·
Inventory system
flexibility to order upgrade replacement parts in a timely manner through the
formal system.
Many if not all of these
processes are already in place in most companies that hold moderate to large
parts inventories. But they are frequently not a high priority for rigorous
administration, and they are rarely optimized. Thus, there are considerable opportunities
for improvements that readily result in cost savings. Experience shows that
honing in on these processes can result in significant initial reductions in
MRO parts inventories; additional reductions almost always follow as staff
confidence and expertise in the processes increases.
Step 3: Improve Safety Stock Calculation
Recommending purchase orders
to replenish stocked parts is key to an effective CMMS (Computerized
Maintenance Management System) or EAM (Enterprise Asset Management) program,
which aims at minimizing total equipment downtime. But while these programs
trigger reorders when safety stocks sink below levels specified, they depend on
manual input to determine what those safety stock levels should be.
Calculating the safety stock
quantity should include multiple variables, such as:
·
Verification that the
supported equipment is still in service.
·
Cost of the part.
·
Shortest delivery time
from all sources including off-site storage, supplier distribution points and
sister facilities.
·
MTBF and standard
deviation for the part.
·
Critical level of
equipment the part supports.
·
Availability of
substitute parts or “work around” processes.
In practice, systematic use
of these variables is rare. Safety-stock levels are frequently determined by maintenance
engineers or information technology support staff using seat-of-the-pants or
“cya” estimates that exceed quantities actually needed.
Safety stock can be further
optimized when staff have access to data and algorithms that can help them
balance inventory costs against the risk of corporate loss. Developing such
algorithms requires a clear understanding of the company’s long- and short-term
financial goals as well as, in the case of utilities, the obligation to serve.
Step 4: Improve Processes for Unplanned Requirements
MRO inventories frequently
contain major components of mission-critical equipment—an extra engine is
common. These are frequently purchased at the same time as the equipment and
capitalized as part of the total purchase. All too often multi-site facilities
duplicate these rarely needed components and retain them until the equipment is
retired, resulting in the need to discard essentially new components. Comparing
component stockpiles available at different sites and reducing component
inventories as equipment nears its replacement date can minimize such
expenditures.
Cost savings can be realized
when sites compare and share this inventory. To maximize multi-site sharing,
staff must adhere rigorously to a common system of description when listing
parts so that searches of multi-site inventories return correct results
quickly.
Increasingly effective
preventive maintenance programs reduce the demand for unplanned MRO parts
inventories. Reality dictates, however, that the demand for such parts will
never fall to zero.
Step 5: Optimize Ordering
Ideally, each part would be
ordered when the projected demand generated from the future scheduled
maintenance work order exceeds the quantity on hand minus safety stock. The
purchase order due date is calculated as follows:
·
Begin with the date
required for preventive maintenance scheduled work.
·
Back up this date by
the time required for internal picking and kitting of the material for the
maintenance work order.
·
Back up the new date by
internal receiving, inspection, and testing time.
·
Back up the new date by delivery time from the vendor
site or distribution point to the receiving dock.
·
Back up the new date by accurate (neither inflated, nor
“rush”) supplier lead time.
·
Back up the new date by
some factor for safety time (if required based on supplier & transportation
reliability).
·
Back up the new date by
internal purchase order processing and approval lead-time.
Cost-cutting opportunities
in this area include:
·
A reduction in
minimum-order requirements negotiated with the supplier.
·
Supply chain
initiatives like vendor consolidation and electronic ordering. These are
frequently already in place in connection with large purchase orders; their
extension to the small order quantities characteristic of MRO is often cost
effective.
·
Elimination of safety
time used to insure timely delivery of parts. Safety time (not to be confused
with safety stock) can frequently be reduced or eliminated as supplier programs
and supplier communications evolve.
Conclusion
An inflated MRO inventory is
an opportunity for cost reductions in most energy and manufacturing
organizations. And it is not a one-time event. The MRO inventory must be
reevaluated periodically to ensure that it is reduced appropriately following,
for instance:
·
Mergers with or
acquisitions of companies with similar or identical equipment. Mergers also
create the possibility that stocks can be consolidated and reduced because the
same MRO parts may support multiple pieces of equipment.
·
Changes in technology.
Newly available parts from either the original manufacturer or an aftermarket
supplier may, for instance, extend MTBF.
·
Changes in corporate
strategy that alter the importance of specific equipment and its products to
the bottom line. Such changes may significantly alter the risk factors used to
optimize the capital investment in parts.
Sidebar
What Is MRO?
MRO (Maintenance, Repairs
and Operations) inventory consists of the indirect materials that are required
for manufacturing processes, but do not become part of the product. The bulk of
MRO inventory consists of small quantities of lots of parts used for repairs to
machinery and equipment.
Unlike Raw Materials (Raws),
Work in Process (WIP) and Finished Goods (FGI) inventories, MRO inventory items
are usually expensed upon receipt and do not appear on the balance sheet.
Joanne Kelley
is managing director, TransFormance Group, and senior vice president, SPL
WorldGroup. She has more than 20 years of
global experience with energy companies, consulting in benchmarking,
outsourcing, sales force automation, due diligence, product and service
feasibility, and organizational and business alignment resulting from
deregulation. TransFormance Group Affiliate Karen Schneider is an expert
in areas where information technology and strategy intersect, including process
reengineering, IT issues during mergers, and enterprise resource planning. She
holds a number of certifications in manufacturing and network systems and has
taught graduate level manufacturing courses at Colorado State University.